No, he disputed the claim that Abec makes huge profit margins. He is disputing the claim, burden falls on the claimer.
Sorry @Fissh02 but I think 90% on this forum will take the word of @mmaner as a proof⌠he doesnât have a reason to make up stuff or lieâŚ
My point was, (if you read it at all) that he canât prove it isnât true if he doesnât have proof.
Does that matter? Maybe Iâm not part of the 90 %
Youâre an a$$hat⌠My proof https://www.electric-skateboard.builders/t/why-has-this-industry-been-so-overpriced-for-so-long/75387/185
And my point is that he doesnât need to prove it because he is disputing the claim.
That is a ludicrous statement and you kneed a course in logic. I made no claim, I disputed a claim, so the burden of proof remains on the person who made the claim.
Good lordâŚ
Good lord to you, sir. My point was that you canât prove it is completely untrue. You can dispute the claim. But you canât disprove it.
Another ludicrous statement. You donât know that I CANT prove it, you know know that I WONâT prove it. So you do NOT know the truth of anything, your just letting stupid fall out of your mouth again and againâŚ
So what was your statement for? And stop slinging mud, stick to the topic at hand. It doesnât help your case
Instead of creating a new wheel company, can we pay for a university course in economics and logic for these two?
Yes but as @braeden.dilger1 already pointed out you have to prove it⌠not the opposite way roundâŚ
Wrong yet a 3rd time. I can prove it is untrue, I just donât choose too. Iâll give you a hint though⌠Less than 72 hours ago there was a thread where sufficient proof was offered. Go read, itâll do you some good.
But i posted proof
I need a buzzer to press every time someone calls names. Its hilarious at this point.
the only âs***-stirrerâ i see is you mate acting like a tough guy name calling on people from behind your screen.
Care to link me it?
Economics is the latest tough guy talk. K.
Where? 10 char