The board has a front/back arch and a heel/toe concave which is more pronounced in the middle.
So in order to have the same workable space for the batteries in the middle of the deck, the enclosure appears to be thicker when looking at it from the side but it does in fact have the same 25mm clearance in the middle.
also, note the board wasn’t designed for jumping. The flex was engineered for carving, not for absorbing jumps (although going on and off curbs is certainly not a problem, besides maybe scratching the motormount). Also, I’d recommend trying the board before installing bindings. It’s much wider than conventional boards and if you use the Matrix2, you’ll find your lean angle will surprise you. Anyhow, maybe you’ll prefer bindings, I’m just saying you should try the board without for at least a couple of days before making the call.
Cheers,
A
There’s not much room for error! If you want, you can PM me your design and I’ll do my best to confirm fitment. Depending on your design… The compartments have rounded corners that might interfere if you rely on only 1mm for clearance, up to you!
I’m using the NESE modules
74 x 93 x 22.5 for the 4p module I just measured.
I think I’ll be ok with the rounded corner since we can move vertically if necessary.
I was going to use the 12s 4p on an Evo build. With all the width on your board, I want to see how may P groups I can fit in 235mm. The enclosure seems perfect for this.
Alright, I have a dumb question for ya. I think it would be cool to have this deck combined with some 6 shooters and Surf rodz RKP (with 200mm hangers and 90 mm axels to accomodate @psychotillers mounts).
You see, I have these adjustable base plate trucks and I think they will accomodate the wedge…